The Best Mario Salieri

IPSE DIXIT! GREETINGS

Art is what you do not understand the meaning,

but of course have a meaning

Each portrait is painted with passion the portrait of the artist,
and not the model.
(O. Wilde)

The work of art is always a confession.
(U. Saba)

Art should never groped to be popular. The public should try to become an artist.
(O. Wilde)

aspiration closed within one interpretation, that's art.
(B. Cross)

The art of a people is a true reflection of his mind.
(J. Nehru)

B isogna be a living man and an artist postu mo.
(J. Cocteau)

The artist is a man who never prostitute his art,
except for money.
(H. Meyers)

love art, of all the lies that the mind is still less!
(G. Flaubert)

When deceived for the sake of beauty,
you realize that being an artist.
(M. Jacob)

Artist is only those who can make the solution of an enigma.
(K. Kraus)

Learning to see the training is longer than all the arts.
(De Goncourt)


Reality is an uproar in the art must be able to make a harmony.
(A. Graf)

Parts Of A Camera Diagram

2007/2008

********************************* ***********************

BEST WISHES OF MERRY CHRISTMAS HAPPY NEW YEAR


MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY EPIPHANY, AND WHO HAS BEEN GOOD


KNOWS AND WHO WAS NOT GOOD
KNOWS, KNOWS WELL!
:)

************************************ ********************

Best 3ccd Prosumer Camcorder

The Face of Christ

Since we are at Christmas (and this was a speech that I wanted to be a bit 'of time) I'll talk a bit' of the Most High God our Lord. Indeed no wait, not c high OSI, I do not know can not, speak of Jesus Christ, the son p er be clear, what is embodied in earth, these clarifications do so in a way that is clear to everyone, for those who believe and for who does not. This is not a post about religion. Reflection c he going to make me come up with a pai or months ago and now I must give respect to Professor Stefano Ferrari and on or program examination of the Psychology of Art. One of the most interesting exams I've ever done. - Let me first note of color, a so-called joke Industry: Background: One of the texts was also the sense of the uncanny and the double. While waiting for the professor to the appeal, I considered not doing the haunting, and having seen him only once in the photos on the site, seeing that all other test-takers like me get up to the passing of a distinguished gentleman, I ask the first guy side: it is he? and I replied: No, it's a double! is a double! is Uncanny! is very disturbing! ") - Let's get started. In one of the books I had you spoke of Christ's face as has been represented over the centuries. And the difference between the Shroud, and Veronica Icon . Veronica, who left here you see in the photo taken by me at the window of the Basilic of Holy Blood in Bruges in Belgium ( Santa Veronica , commonly known as the woman who wiped her face with a cloth of Christ along the Via C rucis ; literally identifies as Veronica the handkerchief with which a certain Elizabeth wiped the face of Christ, Veronica Vera Icon = / for more information: http://www.santiebeati.it/dettaglio/62275 ) .. and he speaks of it also said that not only the man was made in the image and likeness of God, but also vice versa! In the sense that man is God figure in his own way, in the way of man. From this we can say that we all ended up quite e are reminded of a certain imaginary it the face of Christ and God the Father, and that most likely happen if you really that Jesus Christ came on land and reincarnate in on and its human features, and by chance did not correspond to what we have in mind, we do not recognize it as such. Auks I wondered what my private image of the face of Christ. And I answer this way: to force one of Zeffirelli's film Jesus of Nazareth 1977. Then I wondered who the actor. I found it: this Robert Powell. Well, certainly I will be granted, but I think that was Jesus Christ in the flesh, if you know what I mean. How else can it be done? Also to M. Gibson's The Passion is not bad, but it looks like it's not him! It 'just an impersonator! I thought that actor, after the third film about Jesus had not done anything more, I certainly think you could compromise by now! But no, I discovered that he had made more! First ones are: Perdition 1974, 1975 and Tommy Beyond Good and Evil 1977, the same year G. d N. Then in 1982 The Hunchback of Notredamme . All the movies I'll look good and then see if I will not be without God! Ok first do not count those, but maybe my theory not compromised after it is completely wrong, according to the fact that the first movie after that is 5 years away , and then did not know there no others. Or not? Nevertheless established the fact that if G esu Christ one day you were to reincarnate and appear right to me unless it had the features of Robert Powell I would give him the impostor! That's my Immage Christi. Then I wondered what was a figurative level. Because of paintings by the baptism of Christ, Ecce Homo, Christ at the Column, Resurrection, etc. I have studied many , at the end after a long search I found it. It is a Ecce Homo, 1893 , never heard of Joaquin Martinez Delavega ? That's exactly this artist has painted my image of Christ. And you? have you ever thought? if it came a blond for example? Believe him? I must say that a couple of years ago, a RAI production in 1999 had a Jesus physically risky type guy from California, that Jeremy Sisto ... and he convinced me not at all. Robert VS Jeremy 1:0! Sorry Jeremy, you did your best, no one is perfect! But I wanted to add one more thing:

"sostiengono Some scholars, however, that according to Jewish customs of the time, Jesus could not wear long hair. To support this thesis he cites a passage from St. Paul (First Corinthians 11.7 to 16) which defines "indecent" let grow hair. . Also, since Judas kissed him to recognize it, it is assumed that Jesus was a person like many others, without prominent physical characteristics. "

's, but then why in all the movies always has long hair? and also there are Shroud beard and long hair (if it is really him and not just any man as some claim). ... I do not know ... I've never seen depictions of Jesus with short hair. Or am I wrong? tell me if you find as well. Shaved yes, see for example the 'Christ Blessing' by Raphael, and in fact, deep down I was never convinced even that, but not with short hair I think ...

'During Late Antiquity, with the secularization of Christian worship and the separation from the Jewish tradition, spread, direct representations of Jesus depicted as a beardless youth to 6sec; by 4sec also appears bearded Jesus with long hair, which will become its canonical representation (eg. St. Apollinaris Nuovo in Ravenna)

then disappears from the east while the beardless Jesus sometimes appears in Carolingian and Romanesque . The emergence of a bearded was influenced by the emergence of images deemed authentic as the Mandylion and Sacred Shroud. In Byzantine iconography of Jesus is strictly codified, even after the dispute sull'iconoclastia.

From the Renaissance it has evolved in the West, breaking the stillness of the Byzantine representations. At this time the figure of Jesus was secularized and became the prototype of the perfect man. This vision will have its greatest exponent in Michelangelo that retrieves the image in the Judgement of the early Christian beardless Christ '.

Muse Space Dementia Piano Sheet Music

Raffaello Sanzio (part 1)

" very sure it can be said that the holders of the dowry of Raphael are not just men, but of mortals " Giorgio Vasari

What can I say?

I am in love with Raphael.

6aprile was born on Good Friday 1843 in Urbino
died on his birthday in 1520.

or why we believe will be the first, as is clear from the title, many posts about Raphael, I do not want to make a monograph but surely there will be constant references. Instead of a long post a topic that no one finishes reading, the better to be re and sliding.

But because I like Raffaello? His Madonnas are more beautiful than the other, (* will post separately on Madonnas) and it's not all the paintings end up 500eschi shirts, bags, TV and merchandising various of the world not? If you can eg evenings a compliment ... as he once told my professor of Italian literature: 'Dante is one of the few who has forever the privilege of being mentioned too and those who do not even know who he was.' And apparently the two cherubim of thoughtful 'Madonna S instinct' unaware they have this luck ... Anyway I was saying, because I like Raffaello ? Several reasons. Without using words as a true art criticism, or courtly encyclopedic ... I find, like, smooth, clean, elegant ... even in the scenes of 'movement' as the 'San Michele, which break through Satan', or St 'George defeating the dragon ' (1504-06) everything is in order. (* will separate post about San Giorgio) also Renoire On the other hand, on returning from or traveling to Italy in 1881, as Raphael said, I do not I draw! So try to change his style and to emphasize the outlines of the figures (see umbrellas). to say that I like anyway Renoire before and after galvanizing Italian! Okay Then I remember a particular linked to Raphael. During the period when I lived in Bologna, lived in Porta Castiglione, and I invite you to see 'live' Who was that gentleman in the magnetic 'Portrait of Baldassare Castiglione ' 1 514. And what of 'The Three Graces'? Work to which I too wanted to make a modest but no less enigmatic tribute. http://alessiaromeo.blogspot.com/search/label/fotografia
Who will interpret the interpreters as desire. As the gentleman, the exhibition in 2005 in which I exposed, look, he turns to his wife by the arm and says: "Poor Rafael! It is turning in his grave! I was there just over the back and of course no one knew I were the author, and of course I did not say anything. As a colleague of mine at the university looked at it for a while 'in silence and then said with a smile: that irony! Brava Ale! ... However you say it Well with the three have made them all in one way or another, yes Okay, but I like those of Raphael, with nothing removed all'insostenibile lightness of marble of Canova. Especially I like better since I 'discovered' what were in fact the three Graces and why have those three apples in his hand, the so-called apples of Aphrodite. The three gauzes I found to be: able to give, to know them, to return.

I once saw by chance one afternoon in a TV movie about his life, old, black and white, and I was impressed that the phrase Raphael says to his disciple, on the other apprentices there were evidence to draw on evidence. The disciple asked for permission to send everyone home early today, and he says yes, let them enjoy the May! ' ... The May! ... It's so elegant! And I since that time whenever I use that phrase gave me a tone I use it! Obviously not think there is no historical proof that he has actually said this phrase at the time, fuguriamoci, phrase by tuti day, but the fact that I have heard from the mouth of the enfant prodige for I buy the absolute value of historical phrase! In the film, then you also talked about the fact that you say that Isabella d'Este (respectable woman that I visited the widow's room at Castello di Mantova) was in love with him, and continued to ask for a portrait, but He applied more elegantly. Then she is jealous kidnap the bride, the famous 'Fornarina'-Margaret, "and other things. In short, the film I liked it but I've never been able to find it anywhere. ' We know from Vasari that the artist lived with a girl who dearly loved, which decided to separate, for religious reasons only shortly before his death' ( http://www.exibart .com/notizia.asp/idnotizia/4285 ) but I do not remember where (and I apologize if that phrase back often in my speeches), I read that he aspired to become a Cardinal, but that was promised to a girl of rank say (not that Fornari Margaret was the daughter of a baker), with which but always put off the decision of the wedding on the pretext of work for these reasons: Fornarina and desire to become a Cardinal. Do not forget Isabella d'Este, jealous as a magpie ... in short, was a little 'beauty of the country goes! The only stain, and I remember exactly where I read it this time because there's been malissssimo ('The Cortogiane Oneste' book about the history of prostitutes in the 500 and 600 in Rome and Venice) said that he, like all artists, and how all of the time used to go from so-called honest courtesans ... namely the young ladies in charge. Here we have our main no no! There was! ... Other than cardinal!

Cubefield Cheats That Work

The Da Vinci Code. (Or: misplacement)

days ago I let myself be persuaded to see 'The Da Vinci Code'. More than anything else out of necessity because there was nothing to see ... that it is not raging and do not know why, even with all the publicity that I did not go unnoticed ... and then in the meantime I had recommended lto conflicting opinions: my boyfriend read the book and liked it, not I remember those who had criticized the fact that 'a film about Leonardo da Vinci and there is no scene filmed in Italy! ' (Okay this criticism to criticism), someone else had seen the movie and he liked it some did not, Okay de gustibus non est disputandum, and I finally saw it too. In the opening scenes especially you see the rooms of the Louvre with many works that actually there is grim. I state that I have never been to the Louvre in Paris and even, but obviously sooner or later in life you gotta go, see Paris and then you die ... (Such as Naples is not it?). Last weekend a colleague of mine is gone. Dialogue: collega1: I'v Been In Louvre! Collega2: have you seen the Mona Lisa? Collega1: yeees! She's amazing! Collega2: did she smile at you? ... Ha ha:). closed in parentheses. We return to the Da Vinci Code. Here I have to open a parenthesis of film criticism: It will be because I saw it in Italian as I know, but the female lead was less expressive of Dana Scully in the first two series of The X-Files. The expression you see in the photo above is almost the same for the whole movie! And be careful! She is the one in the bottom right, not the elegant lady behind him, that even after centuries, at least hints at a smile! The Wailing Wall is more expressive. And then the 'general ignorance of protogaonista left speechless. As she qu time in high school one of my classmates had the courage to say in the question of art history 'Bruno Elleschi' instead of Brunelleschi ... Philip. I sgranto eyes and she was ashamed x, instead I were the teacher I think I fainted. Anyway back to the main character ... I grant that you may not know the detail of the hand and the person in more 'feminine' as part of the last supper, because it is a detail that the tourist, the profane, the ignorant in the field say, does not know, if notices, and interprets the pre-established framework in a way that is, what the title says, that a dinner of only males. But if it was that you can not know the existence of the Crusades, and that there is also the Apocrypha, or you know maybe you do not know suggest that Mary Magdalene was 'lover' or companion of Jesus, but then again if it was, Because it means that more than college, you lived on a desert island, and if you lived in'isola desert how do you do this or that policeman is in Paris? anyway ... when the super teacher of Seven and explained the history of the Templars Holy Grail and Mary Magdalene so that fell from the clouds like a dive boing747 damaged ... Now I say one thing: as the setting for the film is contemporary, and the girl in the movie is young, around thirty will not know, I wonder and I say, but at school, wherever you shall have done, never heard of the Crusades? Ever seen a movie that I know about the Middle Ages, or Jesus of Nazareth, where is Mary Magdalene? Or ever seen nememno India Jones and the Last Crusade, which speaks of the Holy Grail? O The Fisher King with Robin Williams and Jeff Bridges? mean something I'm rico cultural or any movie that rifesce something like this as they hit the Crusades, or religion, Mha! ... course we Italians are more lucky, we can not know, because our St. Francis of Assisi was also knight in the Crusades, and go Well this tells you the nun in grade school ... but you, I say, English or French you are, but how can you not have even heard? mha! In a little 'solve the Rubik's cube in three years ... mha! ... However I said, apart from the blinding ignorance of the girl, the film is a sort of treasure hunt polizziesco-European international intrigue and mystical religious frenzy, and ends at the point of departure. And it goes well, except that me and the yellow police personally do not like, I do not dwell further and get to the point where I explain why at the end q T his film I did not like. At one point, towards the end where you see a piece of advice I of cardinals who I believe were in the Vatican, but it is said, in short, in the great hall, co know there behind the plank to give a voice to the environment? The 'Taking of Christ garden' by Caravaggio in 1601. ... Beautiful and majestic. Gives prestige to the room ... and because I think the Vatican is probably one takes it to the oroginale, why should they have a poor copy? There are all the originals to the Vatican palaces ... Caravaggio has left other wonderful works in Rome ... In short you think is there because it's always been there from the outset exactly. Even you will indeed get the original, like the ones you've seen before in the Louvre ... Unfortunate that this work is to be bombastic at the National Gallery of Ireland in Dublin (Ireland which is quite far from Rome right?) I know this because in these months I just grim in Dublin and I went several times to see live and I would say it's worth its worth a trip here. This is my best work around the museum. I've seen it several times (because fortunately here Wallpaper For the museums), to 5 cm away and without glass in front, and I swear that the rest always enchanted. Almost like Vermeer's paintings are immediately thereafter quetsi shame that they are small. comuqnue tornado to Caravaggio might think: Well Okay, maybe the first was in Rome, then took her to Dublin, it can be. NO but that can not be! Before when? I remind you that the film is set in present day, 2006, but this framework (for years attributed to Gerard of the night) was in possession of the Jesuit Fathers in Dublin since the 30th of this century, given to him by a widow with those points. The Jesuits themselves then Recently the 'loan' to the Nation Gallery of the city permanently. I'm sorry but this oversight of the director or whoever he may accept if you make a film that features art in one way or another! How to say 'I have a living room in Van Go gh of 1895' when he died 5 years earlier. Then: g IA, the film I was saying much, then I recognized this 'misplacement' let's call it, and more at the end of the movie when Tom Hanks is if the walk from the hotel to the Louvre (which I have said to be very long way!) in pajamas and slippers, I thought 'Okay, since that too, next please '. ... The only thing that has aroused interest in this film is near the end: the church of Rennes-le-Château, in Scotland, of which I had never heard of, and I'd like to visit sooner or later.
I will let you know ... .

How Do I You Play Poka

Physiognomy

The work that you see here is 'Young woman in the mirror' of Giovanni Bellini in 1515. Now: I'm not talking about the style, nor who this girl, or the reflection in the mirror or the landscape behind, or the strange story of carpet (which looks like the Persian rug in my house) and even the package in the lower right (not that that between the I think is the reason why you are doing good) ... No nothing of it. I wanted to mention this picture because I think the woman / girl in question looks like my mother as a girl. Did I always said, once Did I also made see and she said, "to mee? Mha! "My mother now has 57 years, does not show, and when she was a girl was really beautiful. green eyes and long blond hair, thin, though not exactly 1 meter and 80 had a nice figure. She resembles her mother my grandmother, and everyone says that I have in my turn his / their copy, and indeed it is true, But not for me alone I say that beautiful, no! Also because of her I got the height, or rather the meanness we say, never the other grandmother was a meter and a cap, never a mother meters and two caps, and I maybe a meter and 3 plugs. I say this because it's true. even once I did see a picture of my 18 year old mother (daughter of style flowers, my mom is 50, ergo in 68 had 18y.o., photos in black and white, with low rise jeans, straight hair parted in the middle) to my boyfriend at the time, or flight dicend guess who? first sight and he said: "Well that question is, are you Al?" Enclosed in parentheses. ... I was saying to me, inside me, that girl of 1515 is my mom! Every time I happen to see this picture I think of her, so for me now in me the two people equivalent. And if I could buy him regalrei original! But for now be satisfied with a poster ... And there is another framework (This comes after) of Egon Shilo, 1917, that does not even have a title defined as something 'Woman Sedu knee up' instead I think it's my sister! Caught in one of his many look to between the 16 and 20 I think. This, too, I made him see and she said: iooo?? ... Between the two pictures are centuries away, but what can I do? Now all this is to say: do not ever to anyone else to see in a famous picture you know? Yet studies physiognomy say that the faces are repeated in centuries later and that some places do not pass ever, certain genes are more active than others. It depends also from the long then. For example it is demonstrated dimostratissimo I would say that the people on the islands somigliadi more. I say from the pulpit that I'm in Ireland in recent months that the children are all the same! As adults change a bit, 'but prorpio little but are made by small-cutter or pastries. So this is to say that as I look like my mom, even the copy, she was a copy of of his mother, and my mom again looks like a girl in 1500, which looked like his mom etc. etc. I know. My brother somoglia to my grandfather, my sister to paternal grandmother, my nephew is a copy in miniature of his father, etc. etc. .... yes but this is Who cares? So to say ... Ooh you who read (vocativo!) this post that you seem to talk of nothing , you ever noticed if you have distant relatives immortalized in the famous Louvre or the Vatican Palace ? I yes, two! Tiè! And what's danotare ch is true for everyone on your insufferable neighbor or your best friend ever! ... case and then let us tell me!

How Much Are The Bowling Shoes At Amf?

AUTHOR IN QUESTION

Name: Alessia
Name: Romeo
Born: Melito Porto Salvo (RC) The
: 01/03 / 1977
Living in: Verona

Diploma Degree Student
Dams Visual Arts
Occupation: Member of Any Other
Helios http://helios-verona.blogspot.com

amateur artist:
http://alessiaromeo.blogspot.com

citizen of the world and proud to be ITALIAN !

Privacy Clause For Confidentiality

REASON FOR

so long felt the need to share with the world all the 'critical' on the various works of art that crossed my mind, and I finally decided this was the right time (before I forget them ) and that it is the space. Criticism, yes ... then a picture, or any work that is not only criticism, and even more than that, he originates first of all to me an infinite number and concentric, centrifugal and centripetal multiple divisible memories and feelings ... with connected ... no? See in life we \u200b\u200bare allowed more than understand. Interpreting for most of the time is a long and brain that not everyone wants to do. Iconography, iconology, symbolism ... words that most people can not explain or tell ... but this does not mean that any person can not say in front of his view of any work. Did you ever say this 'thing', statue or picture that is (the music is different matter) brings to mind another thing that has nothing to do? and what you hear you answer yes, in fact, has nothing to do neinte. But you, inside you, in your underwear, you think like Nanni Moretti said, "has nothing to do but got to do!" Here I mean ... In my ongoing training of art criticism, some very small it seemed to understand that the criticisms apply to work for what they are worth, no matter who says them. Be the most famous of the luminaries or the last of the men may have a corollary of the first explanations to convince us, the other can not have one, but the feelings that led him to 'tell her,' to talk about a particular rather than another are all valid, because private and personal. By 'good' does not mean objectively verifiable and historically, those ok we can give them the historian. I am of the author only has the key to what he meant. And here it creates a paradoxical situation. To understand a work that the author should leave a detailed explanation, a kind of manual autographed work by work, by which to interpret can not run away, just read the warnings. But this thing is not possible, and even when it was not something that an author feels to do. First because I'm of the opinion that every person has only one way (and some not even that) that is able to express at best, and usually written language and visual language coincided not really. Second, writing down feelings? Knowing exactly what you feel, how to say it, and how it is interpreted? If you do not say that it is not allowed to own all right? I speak also for my little personal experience. I was asked to write what I wanted to be close to my works for an exhibition, a kind of presentation: now, even though my works in question were not sure who knows what epsressionismo Russian enterprise was more difficult than ever! And to what end and hung, and still at a distance of a couple of years are not happy with what I wrote and that people read. But now ... Okay ...
However, this space is dedicated to my work, but the most famous: of which you can find pages, books and volumes of criticism famous for ever and ever, and which certainly do not pretend to put myself in competition ... but on which, as they say, well I say mine. I wondered, can never be of interest to anyone in the world that comes to my mind looking at a painting? One of my memories as a child, the one strange thing in the bottom right there in that picture of the Dutch 300 which I think I've only noticed on the face of the earth, on which I made by myself congiutture interstellar, or if I say that I think the Mona Lisa is not that much and I prefer it another .... the responses were numerous. The best were: Okay I do not call Achille Bonito Oliva blog as a blog but a difference unless you want me to do? And then talk about something that is not in competition TV is going to sound good no? And then what is it? Sgarbi can only say that work sucks? Last but not least: sorry, I had in mind this fine title for a while 'time, it was a shame not to use it! :)