It is said that a female nude is always nice, and a male nude to be nice to be perfect. Maybe so. With all the ways you can give the naked, from the purely academic to the divine beauty, which means instead of a woman dressed? This post will not say much about it, because I think the images speak for themselves. It 's true the suit covers the forms but sometimes enhances, or falsifies, a dress may be beautiful but badly led by the wrong woman (and if I see a lot). On the contrary, there are beautiful women who are well known with the rag on him (and if they see a few). But we do not want to talk about clothes or fashion history. Let me just say that I find that the woman in all the centuries in which it was portrayed was never so beautiful as in the paintings of ladies in 1400. In the next century, without taking anything away from Gentileschi and Caravaggio, of course, never, a little 'things change I think, to say nothing of 1600 with what I call the' construction 'of the woman, if 
nso that the poor 
built around a dress, too tight to the torso and hips too pompous, and she had to fit inside. But here you can see, and never was more appropriate verb, some of the ladies that I think, in my opinion, pose, clothing, hairstyles as well, and not least in the eyes of the finest in beauty. There's largest complimeto for me you can do to a woman in qualsisi time elegant and ladies are portrayed in 400 of course, are elegant in the sense absolutely right! At one of these I have ventured to make a modest tribute to my Art Gallery with the work 'Queen of Hearts' (http://alessiaromeo.blogspot.com/) Unfortunately the list is endless here, but I limit myself only to these not to fall in the banal rhetoric, I have intentionally omitted the famous 'Lady with an Ermine' ch andall know to go look for some less well-known face, but certainly not least Elgen. To do no wrong to anyone I simply put them in chronological order, when I found the exact date. The last is an infiltration in this post because of the next century, but a few years, just because of my favorite Raphael! This must give me
nso that the poor 
built around a dress, too tight to the torso and hips too pompous, and she had to fit inside. But here you can see, and never was more appropriate verb, some of the ladies that I think, in my opinion, pose, clothing, hairstyles as well, and not least in the eyes of the finest in beauty. There's largest complimeto for me you can do to a woman in qualsisi time elegant and ladies are portrayed in 400 of course, are elegant in the sense absolutely right! At one of these I have ventured to make a modest tribute to my Art Gallery with the work 'Queen of Hearts' (http://alessiaromeo.blogspot.com/) Unfortunately the list is endless here, but I limit myself only to these not to fall in the banal rhetoric, I have intentionally omitted the famous 'Lady with an Ermine' ch andall know to go look for some less well-known face, but certainly not least Elgen. To do no wrong to anyone I simply put them in chronological order, when I found the exact date. The last is an infiltration in this post because of the next century, but a few years, just because of my favorite Raphael! This must give me 
order:
I ° 1490 'Cecilia d'Este' Ambrogio de
Predis
II 1490 'La belle Ferroniere'
of L.da Bernardino da Vinci
III IV Cotignola
Lorenzo Costa the old Fifth
1506 'Lady with a unicorn'
Raffaello Sanzio
0 comments:
Post a Comment