arrived yesterday evening after a casual discussion.
happened to me last night and we watched Victor 'The Factory Girl' biopic about the life of Edie Sedgwick, a 'poor little rich girl' American, became a pop icon of the 60s (on my part never feel appoint ) with success after the meeting with Andy Warhol and the whole of his factory enturage, until the inevitable decline for various self-destruction through drugs at the age of 28 years. Congratulations. Okay other than that ... The film I did not like and I'm still here I wonder why. But also many others on the lives of artists that I saw I did not like, such as 'Control' ... But think about 'The Factory Girl'.
1: Meanwhile, if we want to be honest I do not think that this girl knows that she did all that and this meritrasi fame, if not pose as a model for Life and Vogue and appearing as an actress in some films by Warhol in fact, that, with all due respect to Andy, whose paintings have always liked the idea behind me and very much interested, but what he called movie would have been better to call film only in the technical sense of the movie. That's it. Ok put us that he raised the daily life of an icon or simple artistic act or event concept of intrinsic or extrinsic call it what you want (after much of the art pop art can be said of everything right?) And / or from the lowered aesthetic level of art in itself at the level of everyday life ... but that was in this movie? In these films? And here we reach the point 2: Given the fact that there are two words to indicate a sequence of filmed scenes: movies and movie. Obviously they have two different ways and intentions, the film may be the name and verb, are movie name. The movie is the end product of a series of film-ati if we are not? ... Having said that Andy is not directing anyone, or only gave no
and directions (such as 'take a chair') then you laciava free to interpret as you wanted and some movies are not even understood, are only answers to questions, interview type (movie apppunto not movie) only in direct as they say no? In The Factory Girl, there are some obvious examples, in which there is Edie is what happens where Bob Dylan and others ... so if you technically do not you coach, you're not a director, if 're not a director is not a movie, not even hold the camera, you're not even a camaramen, then what are you doing? Movies, movies, the 'normal' life you put in place in your open space and watch what happens. A short movie. Movie film.
But we still beyond that, which may be a critical critique of the artist Warhol in the film ... apart from that what's in the movie The Factory Girl? The life of this Edie, who with all due respect and sorrow for his children not exactly rosy for charity, what you see? What? Nothing. He lives with his father's money, he knows one of the best Ariti time, she is pretty, is introduced into the world of stars, is a model and actress in Warhol's little film (if we define an actress, I would say that I attend), meanwhile begins to being of this and that intramuscular and in the mood, comes entirely from the world of reality, squanders all violent fall: the collapse of nerves and body recovery. Quick recovery, died of an overdose.
Time: me stories so I will have seen and heard ad nauseum by now. Nothing to say about the acting of the actors ... but I say, but you can still be fascinating story in the venerable 2006 annus domains always the same old story of the poor pitiful rich and damn good artist? and no one adds 'useless' though! But enough! Who knows what I expected! It would have been cool, I say, do the movie if she had not died, if he could testify that he was almost head-on die back in the '60s that crap that life had not given anything that would really value, indeed it to him were about to take the life! It would have been cool to hear them say that sadly I know 'Now I'm fine, I moved to Cabout Cove and I do and I sell my jam! I'm still an artist because I design the labels and they are all unique! I'm so much better than when I was rich and famous and vaffxxxxx to Andy Warhol and all those toxic hallucinations Factory! ' So yes that was a real sarbbe out-sider! But no! Always the same plate. Then towards the end of her films in despair and abstinence ranges from Warhol and other reproaches him as a small (and there I wondered: what do you want an excuse?), while later in the session of analysis at the hospital said that she admitted not having to blame anyone, it was she who had made choices .. . This is the only sensible part of the movie (though in my choices in the true sense of the word he had never done, she had lived in the grip of the events and people) ... and there I was almost happy for her, and already I was wondering who knows at this time, how many years will, etc. etc. (I imagined my grandmother really into country side of Maine), but after 5 minutes in more than a year after it is written died of an overdose and then say 'Well yes but what should I listeners to do!? '
What do you say I'm too cynical? Too cruel? Hit this with the fact that I did not like the movie? And then Andy Wharhol, I repeat, all due respect to its revolutionary new concept in art, but in this film is painted, it is appropriate to say, as a spineless. Amorphous and apathetic towards all those around him, which gave me the idea that more artists, but saprophytic artist, Andy here, and that even if they could cure him. For example, Andy annoying just like a true british when he sees that some of his colleagues take drugs inside the factory there and he just says 'but not boys, where the sign? ' And check out from behind a sheet with a handwritten 'no drogs' with a face as the sign of the series? This? As if to show the boss that sign there, it's there if necessary, is not that why they threw him useless, but no one really cares neither the sign nor especially that the owner of the factory where you bivouacs and through which light reflected live has put that alert. All we need is said 'the boys do not be silly, not drogatevi that hurts you, come on!' . He turns and walks away not in attendance. Scene in my opinion highly explanatory when does not even know how to respond to provocation by Bob Dyland when he says' it's great how you take care of all these people around you ... 'wrong-footed he does not know what to answer. What should I say? No, not that I dont care for them. How do you not care about them? No Yes indeed I care for them but I'm not the boss ... and if I were Bob Dyland I would have said then you work and you only pay the rent for everyone ... congratulations! But do not you see it then you are surrounded by a bunch of pimps
make their pigs comfortable behind you? Like those who take drugs in here even if you put the sign and the two to your shoulders are safely say that 'matching' on a chair in front of everyone as long as you and I are talking about. Now let's forget the idealistic character of Bob Dyland but in that case, perhaps he was absolutely right, at least I would share: takes you to a bunch of idiots all smoke and no fire artistic practice, and leaves.
short Warhol is a person who has not developed any sense of affection (except for mom) from any point of view. At first it seems that Edie to try something private and profound, like an elitist report, later when you find other spaces, we say, is the first time that the shoulders as to tease among children. At least she, in all its naivety and problems some sense of feeling we had and it showed, for both him and for others and was especially excited about what was happening, (some twenty years!) So much to lose control of the situation (yes, twenty years!), but he just seemed to me that an amoeba does not even understand where the ideas throughout this genius. Okay you say, the film is not about him, but on her, he would be the second main character, yes, but hell will not even have a personality? The same reaction of 'no-see-I'm not saying I do not suffer' when he sees that a girl is doing un'ignezione Edie just to the usual ... but I say but that attitude is? And if you care for him because you take it if he met Bob Dylan and wants to go out with him? What is no longer worthy of being an actress for you? Compassionate personally disturbing and emotional level then the scene where they pretend / filming an interview and she is palpated at will by one of the 'actors' as long as the others watch, see and know that she does not want to have some discomfort and disgust, and yet look and say 'ok stop!' rather they tell "by Edie as if I wanted to do!" . But how? but you were not you the one for the feelings verii? What was filming the reality? I wonder when they wanted to go on? That was the first to cry to get free. Then see if this is what really happened or not, but if so then No No I'm sorry Andy you hit rock bottom! And all why? To make them feel even as you say something true? But please! but for whom? You care about her at that moment that really true or have any reactions to your own artistic selfishness? Dai dai!
this short film I do not like it one bit, nor the history of
girl's life, that does not tell anything new compared to others, nor for as is the character of Warhol nor for how it ends. Conclusion: I do not think there was an absolute need for this film, about this girl which follows the lives of many other artists or assumed, unable to manage their own popularity, dall'inconsistenza created and swallowed, and now unacceptable in my humble opinion, the American ideology of 'If there is not exist' (see the joke: you do not want any more, think you're turned mean! - Vulgar, how? - A dear I do not know, but better vulgar but boring!). As long as the idea was that of Oscar Wilde, the first century, could still be sustainable ( Whether it's dime, for better or for worse, as long as we speak) with the necessary clamps, but it was acceptable especially if that air of sufficiency in all others you really think you were really a being. Analyzed and sprimevi really really something different about how it was your company. But if it comes down to believing that life is not appearance, but even flamboyance ... to make others believe that the more YOU ARE many sequins ... here is that eventually, when we no longer speak of you and is replaced with one that resembles you, within six 'as empty cans of your artist friend' . All right, that 'life is too important to be taken Seriously ' ... But there is a limit to everything! So better to live in Cabot Cove and make jam!
'll see that in a few years also will make a biopic about Britney Spears quell'esaurita, which already has had the courage to record a song and make a video like 'Is not she lovely? ' pitiful that is to say nothing ... Sooner or later, dead or not, will be released a movie where the most tragic scene is the one where he shaved his head!
0 comments:
Post a Comment